Logo
DiS Needs You: Save our site »
  • Logo_home2
  • Records
  • In Depth
  • In Photos
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Search
  • Community
  • Records
  • In Depth
  • Blog
  • Community

THIS SITE HAS BEEN ARCHIVED AND CLOSED.

Please join the conversation over on our new forums »

If you really want to read this, try using The Internet Archive.

Boards

Music Social More…

The National - our generation's Radiohead?

sean [Edit] [Delete] 13:24, 10 February '14

A friend posed this question on Facebook the other day, and it seems if REM were the Radiohead of the early 90s, and Radiohead were the Radiohead of the late 90s/early 00s, then there's a slightly younger generation who don't have their 'big alternative band'.

Sure, you could say that Arcade Fire fulfil this role, but I get the impression that even their biggest fans have other bands that they love more. Arcade Fire don't have that 'fuck, you have to hear this band' word of mouth vibe about them.

I'm not sure The National will ever 'do a Kid A' or have an In Rainbows gimmick, which why - as Rob says this week's singles column - they're more like REM http://drownedinsound.com/in_depth/4147405-dis-does-singles-10-02-14--the-national-annie-modern-baseball

Is there a defining band that most alternative fans can get behind and call our own? The sort of band we've seen grow and blossom, rather than caught up with our elders. The National feel like that band to me.

(I guess this thread may not apply to those of you who are over 35)


Drowned in Sound
  • DROWNED IN SOUND
  • HOME
  • SITE MAP
  • NEWS
  • IN DEPTH
  • IN PHOTOS
  • RECORDS
  • RECOMMENDED RECORDS
  • ALBUMS OF THE YEAR
  • FESTIVAL COVERAGE
  • COMMUNITY
  • MUSIC FORUM
  • SOCIAL BOARD
  • REPORT ERRORS
  • CONTACT US
  • JOIN OUR MAILING LIST
  • FOLLOW DiS
  • GOOGLE+
  • FACEBOOK
  • TWITTER
  • SHUFFLER
  • TUMBLR
  • YOUTUBE
  • RSS FEED
  • RSS EMAIL SUBSCRIBE
  • MISC
  • TERM OF USE
  • PRIVACY
  • ADVERTISING
  • OUR WIKIPEDIA
© 2000-2025 DROWNED IN SOUND